The agent works. Could you prove it when it counts?
This check scores your AI agents across four control pillars and names the single gap most likely to fail under scrutiny.
Built on the four pillars Agentisk assesses against, Observability · Auditability · Traceability · Ownership. Aligned to recognised control principles. A point-in-time indication, not a certification.
Your AI agent control readiness
Your priority gap
The standard that appliesSS1/23 applies to banks. For other financial services firms, read this as general model governance.
The direction of travelThe FCA's Mills Review describes supervisory agents testing firm evidence against expectations. To a supervisory agent, evidence it cannot parse and evidence that does not exist return the same finding.
Your one move
Knowing the gap is the easy part. Closing it is our work.
This check tells you where the gap is. Closing it, with evidence that holds when someone who matters asks you to prove it, is what Agentisk does.
Who runs this
Umer Javed. Fifteen years on the buyer side of regulated financial services, five global systemically important banks, four Section 166 reviews, and a seat on the vendor approval panels that decide which agents get bought.
Get our publications, and the occasional note when something is worth your time.
By entering your email you agree to receive Agentisk publications and occasional related updates about our work. We will not share it. Unsubscribe anytime by replying.